FinCEN Rule Vacated

Join Our Newsletter

🚨 FinCEN Rule Vacated

Trust This.

By Joseph E. Seagle, Esq.

🔔 Special Alert: District Court vacates FinCEN’s RRERR

What just happened (in plain English)

A federal district court vacated (killed) FinCEN’s nationwide real estate reporting rule.

That rule would have required reporting on virtually all non-financed residential real estate transfers to LLCs and trusts—no price threshold, nationwide scope.

The court held:

FinCEN exceeded its statutory authority under the Bank Secrecy Act.
The agency tried to label entire categories of transactions as “suspicious”, which the statute does not allow.
The rule is set aside entirely (nationwide vacatur).

Why the court struck it down

1. “Suspicious” doesn’t mean “everything we’re worried about”

FinCEN argued:

Non-financed purchases by entities/trusts are commonly used for money laundering.

The court’s response:

That may be true in some cases, but
You cannot declare 800,000+ annual transactions “suspicious” as a class without individualized reasoning.

Key quote logic:

“Suspicious” requires some factual basis suggesting wrongdoing, not just statistical correlation.

2. FinCEN tried to stretch a procedural statute into a reporting mandate

FinCEN also argued:

It could require reporting under a provision allowing it to impose “procedures.”

The court rejected that:

“Procedures” ≠ new substantive reporting regime
Otherwise, it would swallow the statute’s limits entirely

This is classic “no elephants in mouseholes” administrative law reasoning.

3. The remedy is broad—and immediate

The court didn’t just limit relief to the plaintiff:

It vacated the rule entirely nationwide
Rationale: that’s the default remedy under the APA

So, as of now:

The rule is legally void, not just paused

What this means for Florida real estate title agents, lawyers, and investors

Immediate impact

No nationwide FinCEN reporting requirement (for now)
Title companies, closing agents, and attorneys are not required to file those reports
Compliance costs (projected ~$559M/year) are effectively eliminated

Yes, but don’t relax too much

This is where people get sloppy:

Appeal risk
- This will almost certainly go to the Fifth Circuit (and possibly SCOTUS)
- And the District Court could be moved to stay enforcement of its order, pending appeal
Conflicting rulings already exist
- A Florida federal case (Fidelity v. Bessent) upheld the rule
- That creates a circuit split trajectory
Another case is pending
- In Puerto Rico
GTOs may come back alive
- Geographic Targeting Orders (Miami, etc.) will likely spring back into effect soon as FinCEN deals with this decision
- Those require reporting in certain high-risk markets

Strategic takeaway (for your practice and clients)

The federal government is not backing off real estate transparency
They just overreached procedurally

Expect:

A narrower, better-justified rule
Or Congress stepping in to explicitly authorize it or repeal it
Or the Executive Branch could order the Department of Justice to change course and no longer defend the Rule.
- The President vetoed the Corporate Transparency Act when Congress passed it during his first term. Congress overrode that veto — the only time they ever did so with this president. So the current executive branch has no love lost for anything that springs out of the Act.

What to do for now

Expect title and closing agents to continue to collect information from entity and trust transferees in non-financed real estate transactions until they get further guidance from FinCEN or a final ruling from the courts.
- They must report the information no later than 30 days after closing, so one would hope we get a more definitive answer in that time.
Expect to pay more for closing or settlement fees for such closings so long as the Rule’s effects linger
- It takes a lot of time and energy to collect and report the information, so it costs more.
Watch for news and updates on this issue to keep up with what’s happening with real estate closings.

Bottom line

This is a major but temporary win for:

Real estate investors
Asset protection planners
Title companies and closing attorneys

But structurally:

The pressure toward beneficial ownership transparency in real estate is inevitable

If anything, this decision tells regulators: “Come back with better statutory footing.”

Go Deeper: The District Court’s Order, and Bloomberg Law’s Analysis; our prior reports on the rule.

We hope you found this ALERT edition helpful — any feedback is appreciated and can be shared by hitting reply or using the feedback feature below.

Was this email forwarded to you? Subscribe here.
Have an idea or issue to share? Email us.
Connect with us using your preferred social media and website links for MyLandTrustee and Aspire Legal Solutions.
My Land Trustee mailing address: PO Box 547945, Orlando, FL 32854-7945
Aspire Legal Solution mailing address: PO Box 547934, Orlando, FL 32854-7934
Our physical address: 1901 West Colonial Drive, First Floor, Orlando, FL 32804

Be on the lookout for our next issue! 👋

Some of the links in this email may be affiliate links. If you click on these links and make a purchase, we may receive a commission at no additional cost to you, and you may receive a discounted price or other incentive for a purchase. Rest assured, we only recommend products and services we trust and believe in. Your support is greatly appreciated!

Update your email preferences or unsubscribe here

1901 W Colonial Dr
Orlando, Florida 32804, United States